1.
Put People before Process – Even a manufacturing operation
isn’t a purely mechanical process, but the desire to quantify or measure
activities often leads to the temptation to overlook the human element. People control and influence processes
based on many internal, external, and cultural factors emanating both from
within and outside the organization.
Some are uncomfortable in dealing with the “touchy feely stuff”, but the
interactions within your group ultimately will determine your success or
failure.
2.
Planning is an evolving process, not a rigid guideline –
Preparation, commitment, goal-setting, budgeting, scheduling, and establishing
priorities get you off to the right start but don’t guarantee that you’ll reach
the goal. Flexibility,
adaptability, and assessing risks are part of the process of monitoring the
progress of a project. Don’t be
afraid to say “whoa!”
3.
Measurement validity depends on getting real data, not just
collecting numbers – The usual cost containment mindset is to monitor “budget versus
actual” figures as though the budget was set in stone. Quantifying data means more than just
collecting time sheets and writing weekly reports. Operational data has to be collected at the individual level
and then compiled into meaningful and usable summary data which can be easily
interpreted. Don’t get wrapped up
in the structure of maintaining a schedule or monitoring a grand “to do” list.
4.
Accountability has to be related to authority, performance and
rewards – at both the individual and group level. These variables are interrelated and can’t be proscribed in
isolation. Dictating goals from
the top down or artificially imposing team goals overlooks the opportunity for
ideas to evolve from the ground up.
5.
Achievement must be linked to incentives and to rewards –
Offering bonuses or threatening dismissal are too extreme to be useful controls
in motivating people within the usual boundaries of a fixed length
project. The more innovative
companies also aren’t averse to risking failure knowing that such openness
offers the potential for great rewards.
Don’t wait for the completion to offer rewards or rebukes.
6.
Management by exception – is merely an institutionalization of
the adage that the squeaking wheel gets the grease. The real problem may not be obvious; in fact it may be
hidden under a blanket of minutiae and only appear when a crisis is
reached. Look for the under
currents, engineers called it critical path; in other words distinguish what is
important and what is not.
7.
Meetings, reports, team playing, and the corporate culture –
Good communications are essential both up and down the line. “Management by walking around” achieved
some notoriety as a method of top management keeping in touch with workers. Consistency is more important than
whether the communication channels are structured or informal. If you say one thing and do another,
that communicates a lack of commitment or a conscious duplicity.
8.
Strategic goals, business outcomes, priorities, and trade-offs
are just different ways of describing what gives direction and momentum to a
project. Top management may
be totally committed to a project but dead wrong, which may become apparent as
the project moves along.
9.
Assessing risks versus benefits – Critical judgement involves
a lot of input as well as analytical thinking. Not every idea or every individual is equal or valid, and
brainstorming has its limits. Risk
management involves an entire segment of the insurance industry, but there are
financial as well as safety risks.
And the risk of lost opportunities is perhaps the most insidious of all.
10.
Learn how to define success and failure – So you came in under
budget, on time, and achieved all your goals. The customer must be happy, right? Your contract will be renewed? Often research projects end with the
call for more research, ergo more grant money. Did your project come to closure or just move the organization
along a few steps? How does
the perspective of hindsight change the view that you had at the beginning?
John
Suddath is a transplanted Texan who after several contracts with some of the
alphabet soup of agencies and associations in Washington concluded that the
business climate of the Triangle is a more rational environment than the buzzwords
of bureaucrats. A survivor of a
long-term reinventing government project, John also is known as the Word
Man. Phone: 919-785-1516. Email: jsuddath@earthlink.net